Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292342›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2024

The use of individual and collective selection, optimisation and compensation (SOC) strategies and their association with work ability among senior workers.

Annette Meng, E Sundstrup, Lars Louis Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annette MengNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. ame@nfa.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7872-7600
E SundstrupNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-222X
Lars Louis AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-8085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Selection, optimisation, and compensation (SOC) can be important strategies for maintaining work ability as we age. This study aimed to explore differences in self-reported individual and collective use of SOC strategies across job functions, as well as their association with self-rated work ability.

methodsIn the third wave of the SeniorWorkingLife study, 10,798 workers aged 50 + , across the job function categories "Office work", "work with people", and "work in the field of production", replied to questions about collective and individual SOC strategies and work ability. Using multiple regression, we modelled associations between SOC and work ability.

resultsAssociations between SOC and work ability were generally weaker among participants working in the field of production. Both individual and collective use of selection had much weaker associations with work ability in the job functions "office work" and "working with people". In the job function "working in the field of production", only collective compensation was positively associated with work ability while individual selection was significantly but negatively associated with work ability.

conclusionsThe use of SOC may be particularly beneficial for older employees working with people. Optimisation and compensation may be the most important SOC strategies for maintaining the work ability of older employees working with people and doing office work. For older employees working in the field of production, collective optimisation may support the maintenance of work ability while reduced work ability may be associated with the use of individual selection as a "coping strategy".

Indexed as

Job demands and resourcesOccupational psychologySeniorWorkingLifeSOC modelSustainable workplaces

Identifiers

PMID39292342
PMCPMC11411037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.