Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292314›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2024

Identifying Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of AI-Assisted Clinical Decision Support in an Electronic Health Record System.

Joseph Finkelstein, Aileen Gabriel, Susanna Schmer, Tuyet-Trinh Truong, Andrew Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph FinkelsteinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Rm. 2028, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. Joseph.Finkelstein@utah.edu.
Aileen GabrielDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Rm. 2028, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Susanna SchmerDepartment of Case Management, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.
Tuyet-Trinh TruongDivision of Hospital Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew DunnDivision of Hospital Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Comprehensive Health Informatics Engagement Framework for Pulmonary RehabR33HL143317 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI FINKELSTEIN, JOSEPH E, STEIN, JOEL · 2020 to 2022
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL143317NHLBI NIH HHS R33HL143317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in computing have led to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) enabled healthcare technologies. AI-assisted clinical decision support (CDS) integrated into electronic health records (EHR) was demonstrated to have a significant potential to improve clinical care. With the rapid proliferation of AI-assisted CDS, came the realization that a lack of careful consideration of socio-technical issues surrounding the implementation and maintenance of these tools can result in unanticipated consequences, missed opportunities, and suboptimal uptake of these potentially useful technologies. The 48-h Discharge Prediction Tool (48DPT) is a new AI-assisted EHR CDS to facilitate discharge planning. This study aimed to methodologically assess the implementation of 48DPT and identify the barriers and facilitators of adoption and maintenance using the validated implementation science frameworks. The major dimensions of RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks have been used to analyze interviews of 24 key stakeholders using 48DPT. The systematic assessment of the 48DPT implementation allowed us to describe facilitators and barriers to implementation such as lack of awareness, lack of accuracy and trust, limited accessibility, and transparency. Based on our evaluation, the factors that are crucial for the successful implementation of AI-assisted EHR CDS were identified. Future implementation efforts of AI-assisted EHR CDS should engage the key clinical stakeholders in the AI tool development from the very inception of the project, support transparency and explainability of the AI models, provide ongoing education and onboarding of the clinical users, and obtain continuous input from clinical staff on the CDS performance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsHumansPatient DischargeArtificial IntelligenceClinical Decision SupportElectronic Health RecordImplementation ScienceSocio-Technical Factors

Identifiers

PMID39292314
PMCPMC11410896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.