ArticleJournal of medical systems2024
Identifying Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of AI-Assisted Clinical Decision Support in an Electronic Health Record System.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adoption of artificial intelligence in primary health care: systematic synthesis of stakeholder perspectives.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Practice With Decubitus Risk Prediction Alerts: A Pilot Process Evaluation.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- AI for Health Care Quality and Patient Safety: Scoping Review of Diagnostic, Predictive, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The Digital Transformation of Rehabilitation Medicine: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Innovations, Clinical Integration, and Future Paradigms.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Integrated Analysis of Non-Blood Biological Fluids: From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Decision-Support Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Implementation of Electronic Clinical Decision Support for Radiology Referrals: The Role of Governance, Clinician Engagement and Education.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Advancing Human-Centered AI in Clinical Decision Support: Sociocognitive Human-in-the-Loop Study in HIV Care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in nephrology: predicting CKD progression and personalizing treatment.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Extracting Cardiorespiratory Symptoms From Clinical Notes Using Open-Weight Large Language Models: Method Development and Validation Study.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- Impact of an AI prognostic tool on clinician performance in colorectal liver metastases.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated Implementation Strategies to Promote the Use of AI-Assisted Diagnostic Software for Lung Nodule Screening in China: Process Evaluation Based on the RE-AIM Framework.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Adoption, Adaptation, Assimilation, and Use in the United States.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive recommendations for the implementation of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a narrative review on facilitators and barriers.BMJ open quality · 2026Review
- The anatomy of AI implementation skepticism in Polish healthcare: an explanatory mixed-methods analysis of psychographic barriers among healthcare professionals.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Exploring the Intersection of Nursing Leadership and Artificial Intelligence: Scoping Review.JMIR nursing · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Approaches to Forecast Physical and Mental Deterioration During Chemotherapy in Patients with Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Justice as care: embedding legal services into HIV care to address health-harming legal needs.Critical public health · 2025Article
- Implementers Perspectives on the Routine Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Services: A Qualitative Study Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Health services insights · 2025Article
- Evaluating CFIR 2.0 in identifying digital twin implementation challenges in healthcare: bridging the dichotomy between engineering and healthcare communities.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Deep learning for cardiovascular management: optimizing pathways and cost control under diagnosis-related group models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in computing have led to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) enabled healthcare technologies. AI-assisted clinical decision support (CDS) integrated into electronic health records (EHR) was demonstrated to have a significant potential to improve clinical care. With the rapid proliferation of AI-assisted CDS, came the realization that a lack of careful consideration of socio-technical issues surrounding the implementation and maintenance of these tools can result in unanticipated consequences, missed opportunities, and suboptimal uptake of these potentially useful technologies. The 48-h Discharge Prediction Tool (48DPT) is a new AI-assisted EHR CDS to facilitate discharge planning. This study aimed to methodologically assess the implementation of 48DPT and identify the barriers and facilitators of adoption and maintenance using the validated implementation science frameworks. The major dimensions of RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks have been used to analyze interviews of 24 key stakeholders using 48DPT. The systematic assessment of the 48DPT implementation allowed us to describe facilitators and barriers to implementation such as lack of awareness, lack of accuracy and trust, limited accessibility, and transparency. Based on our evaluation, the factors that are crucial for the successful implementation of AI-assisted EHR CDS were identified. Future implementation efforts of AI-assisted EHR CDS should engage the key clinical stakeholders in the AI tool development from the very inception of the project, support transparency and explainability of the AI models, provide ongoing education and onboarding of the clinical users, and obtain continuous input from clinical staff on the CDS performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.