Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292297›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2024

A reference for selecting an appropriate method for generating glioblastoma organoids from the application perspective.

Jing Liang, Peng He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jing LiangDepartment of Operating Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
Peng HeDepartment of Biobank, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China. hep6ng0806@swmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province 2020JDRC013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma organoids (GBOs) serve as a powerful and reliable tool to study glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) and glioblastoma (GBM). GBOs can be derived from different materials using different methods. To identify the predominant generation methods and the most applications of GBOs, we searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Laboratory) from August 2021 to August 2023. After screening, 42 out of 295 articles were included and analyzed. GBOs in these articles were generated using only one material, such as tumor tissues, tumor cells, and gene-edited multifunctional stem cells, or simultaneously using two materials, such as tumor cells and normal organoids. Methodologically, direct cultivation of GBM cells or tissues was the most commonly used method to generate GBOs. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were the frequently used multifunctional stem cells to generate GBOs by simultaneously silencing P53, NF1, and PTEN using CRISPR/Cas9. In terms of applications, GBOs generated by direct cultivation of GBM tissue had the most applications, including molecular mechanisms, therapy, and culture technique. This review provides a theoretical reference for selecting an appropriate method to generate GBOs when studying GSCs and GBM.

Indexed as

Cell cultureGlioblastomaGlioblastoma organoidsGlioblastoma stem cellsOrganoid

Identifiers

PMID39292297
PMCPMC11411047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.