Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292262›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025

Predictors of response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression.

Qi Wang, Li Li, Hongyan Zhao, Wenwen Cheng, Gang Cui, Lin Fan, Xiaomei Dong, Tianchao Xu, Zhongli Geng

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qi Wang *Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shengyang, Liaoning Province, 110016, China.
Li Li *Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shengyang, Liaoning Province, 110016, China.
Hongyan ZhaoDepartment of Jingzhong Medical District, The Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenwen ChengLiaoning Normal College, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Gang CuiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shengyang, Liaoning Province, 110016, China.
Lin FanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shengyang, Liaoning Province, 110016, China.
Xiaomei DongDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shengyang, Liaoning Province, 110016, China.
Tianchao XuDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, No. 83, Wenhua Road, Shenhe District, Shengyang, Liaoning Province, 110016, China. bzjsxlk@163.com.
Zhongli GengDepartment of Mental Health Prevention and Treatment, Shenyang Mental Health Center, No. 12, Jinfan Middle Road, Hunnan District, Shengyang, Liaoning Province, 110016, China. 18809834110@163.com.

Funding

Liaoning Province Applied Basic Research Program No. 2022JH2/101500040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We aimed to investigate the existence of clinical predictive factors in response to accelerated rTMS in the treatment of TRD. In total, 119 TRD patients who received accelerated rTMS were included in this study. The stimulation protocol was 15 Hz stimulation over the the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The protocol consisted of 25 sessions, each session lasting 30 min for a total of 3000 pulses. Five sessions were applied per day for 5 consecutive days. At baseline (T0), day 5 (immediately after treatment) (T1), 4 weeks after treatment (T2), depression severity was evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), cognitive function was evaluated using Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the intensity of suicidal ideation was evaluated using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was calculated at T0 and T2. The HAMD-17 scores, WCST performance, the C-SSRS scores at T1 and T2 were improved from T0 (P < 0.01). The SII at T2 was lower than at T0 (P < 0.01). The response rates at T1 and T2 were 57.98% (69/119) and 48.74% (58/119), respectively. The results of binary logistic analysis showed that shorter course of depression, two failed antidepressant trials, no history of ECT treatment, and lower levels of SII were predictive factors for accelerated rTMS treatment response at T1 and T2 (P < 0.05), while not having a history of hospitalization was a predictive factor for response at T2 (P < 0.05) but not at T1 (P > 0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off values of SII for discriminating responders from non-responders at T1 and T2 were < 478.56 and < 485.03, respectively. The AUC of SII at T0 predicting response for T1 and T2 were 0.729 and 0.797. We found several clinical predictors of better responses to the accelerated rTMS. Identifying clinical predictors of response is relevant to personalize and adapt rTMS protocols in TRD patients.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexOutcome Assessment, Health CareTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSuicidal IdeationClinical predictorsRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationSystemic immune-inflammation indexTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.