Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292246›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Recommendations for assessment of disability in private accident insurance-Interdisciplinary consensus-Status September 2024 : Recommended for use by the Specialist Society of Interdisciplinary Medical Expert Opinion (FGIMB) on 6 October 2023].

H T Klemm, E Ludolph, W Willauschus, M Wich, S Weber, R Fuhrmann, T Heintel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H T KlemmFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Hamburg, Deutschland. dr.klemm@fimb.de.
E LudolphFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Hamburg, Deutschland.
W WillauschusFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Hamburg, Deutschland.
M WichFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Hamburg, Deutschland.
S WeberFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Hamburg, Deutschland.
R FuhrmannFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Hamburg, Deutschland.
T HeintelFachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung e. V., Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The centerpiece in private accident insurance is the compensation in cases of disability, which must be determined by a physician within a certain time limit. The insurer contract specifies the compensation rate for loss or inability to function. In cases of insurance the medical expert has to refer to generally accepted revised or updated assessment recommendations in order to be able to apply the given framework to the specific individual disability situation of the insured person. This article deals with the interdisciplinary consensus benchmarks for the assessment of disability, which form the principles of a uniform medical assessment of accident-related functional disorders in the private accident insurance.With the publication of these new assessment recommendations developed under the guidance of the Specialist Society of Interdisciplinary Medical Expert Opinion (FGIMB), the recommendations published by Schröter and Ludolph in 2009 [12] are withdrawn, so that these are now replaced as the authoritative version by the assessment recommendations of the FGIMB.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationExpert TestimonyInsurance, AccidentGermanyHumansPersons with DisabilitiesSocieties, MedicalAccident insuranceConsensus benchmark recommendationsDisability assessmentFGIMBImpairment of physical performanceLimb tarifs

Identifiers

PMID39292246
PMCPMC11420361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.