ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
The efficacy of mifepristone-misoprostol regimen versus misoprostol-only for medication abortion at 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks' gestation.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transvaginal ultrasonographic characteristics of different types of residual pregnancy tissue in patients with incomplete medication abortion.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare duration of medication abortion after pretreatment with mifepristone versus misoprostol-only regimens at 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients admitted for medication abortion from 2014 to 2022. Patients underwent feticide due to genetic or anatomical abnormalities at gestational age of 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks. Excluded from this study were patients admitted at gestational age < 22 + 0/7 or > 30 + 0/7 weeks, with multiple gestation, with diagnosis of intrauterine fetal demise before feticide, with contraindication for vaginal delivery, and who were administered a medical regimen other than the mifepristone-misoprostol or misoprostol-only protocol. Information collected included patients' demographics, clinical outcomes, additional procedural interventions, and complications. Data of patients treated with mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-only were compared.
resultsThe study group included 46 patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group and 35 in the misoprostol-only group. Median interval from first dose of misoprostol to fetal expulsion was shorter in the mifepristone-misoprostol group (10.6 vs. 15.3 h; p = 0.007) with shorter duration of hospitalization (3.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.1 ± 1.2 days; p = 0.013). Study groups did not differ in terms of complications. Patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group had a younger gestational age (23.8 ± 1.69 vs. 25.37 ± 2.4 weeks; p = 0.002). However, multivariable Cox regression found that mifepristone was independently associated with shorter abortion time (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.03-2.9, p = 0.03).
conclusionMedication abortion with mifepristone-misoprostol was associated with shorter time to fetal expulsion at gestational ages 22 + 0/7 to 30 + 0/7 weeks, compared with misoprostol-only regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.