Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39292127›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian oral research2024

Impact of L-PRF on pain and healing outcomes in lower third molar surgery: a randomized split-mouth trial.

Raissa Pinheiro Moraes, Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva, Francisco Samuel Rodrigues Carvalho, Jéssica Emanuella Rocha Moura Paz, Gabriel Carvalho Matos, Marcela Lima Gurgel, Edson Luiz Cetira Filho, Eduardo Costa Studart Soares

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raissa Pinheiro MoraesUniversidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5893-4047
Fábio Wildson Gurgel CostaUniversidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-3347
Paulo Goberlânio de Barros SilvaUniversidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1513-9027
Francisco Samuel Rodrigues CarvalhoUniversidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-1268
Jéssica Emanuella Rocha Moura PazUniversidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-1540
Gabriel Carvalho MatosPrivate Dental Office, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8628-575X
Marcela Lima GurgelUniversidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-0542
Edson Luiz Cetira FilhoUniversidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-8955
Eduardo Costa Studart SoaresUniversidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-9308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the effects of L-PRF on pain, soft tissue healing, periodontal condition, and post-extraction bone repair of mandibular third molars (3Ms). A randomized, prospective, triple-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 34 volunteers. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into two treatments: G1 (without L-PRF), G2 (alveoli filled with L-PRF), in which the removal of bilateral 3Ms was performed at the same surgical time. Outcomes were assessed according to a visual analogue scale (pain), soft tissue scoring system (wound healing), periodontal probing of mandibular second molar. Bone repair was determined by volumetric analysis (ITK-SNAP software) and fractal analysis (ImageJ software). An intention-to-treat approach to Statistical analysis was used. L-PRF reduced pain in the 7-day postoperative follow-up (p = 0.019) and not only improved soft tissue healing after 1 month of follow-up (p = 0.021), but also probing depth (distal face) in 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.011). Significant alveolar reduction occurred in 3 months after surgery in both treatments (p < 0.05), however, this was more significant in G1 (p = 0.016). The fractal dimension showed no statistical differences. L-PRF improved postoperative clinical parameters of pain, soft tissue healing, and periodontal condition, suggesting that it has a beneficial effect on preserving the alveolar ridge and accelerating the initial repair process.

Indexed as

Molar, ThirdPain MeasurementPostoperative PainTooth ExtractionWound HealingAdultFemaleFractalsHumansMaleMandibleProspective StudiesReference ValuesStatistics, NonparametricTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39292127
PMCPMC11404852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.