ArticleCoDAS2024
Variability in quantitative outcomes of instrumental swallowing assessments in adults: a scoping review.
Article in CoDAS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo map scientific evidence on the variability of quantitative parameters extracted by instrumental swallowing assessment tests in adults, using the coefficient of variation. RESEARCH STRATEGIES: The methodological procedures recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the extension for scoping reviews of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-ScR) were followed. SELECTION CRITERIA: The search was carried out in the Pubmed/Medline, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL databases, as well as in Google Scholar to consult the gray literature. DATA ANALYSIS: Two blind and independent reviewers screened the articles by title and abstract. Subsequently, the articles were read in full and selected according to the eligibility criteria. Data were extracted according to a standardized instrument.
results363 studies were found, 13 of which were eligible. Most studies had a sample size of less than 30 participants and were made up of healthy individuals. The instrumental exams used were diverse: videofluoroscopy, electrical impedance tomography, laryngeal sensors, high-resolution manometry and surface electromyography. The studies searched for intra-individual variability and the coefficient of variation ranged from low to high variability, as the instruments, parameters and collection procedures were very heterogeneous and non-standardized.
conclusionIntra-individual variability of the quantitative outcomes of instrumental swallowing assessments in adults ranged from low to high according to the exam, outcome, presence or absence of underlying disease, consistency and volume of the bolus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.