ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2024
Absolute Quantification of Glutathione Using Top-Hat Optics for IR-MALDESI Mass Spectrometry Imaging.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demonstrating Voxel-by-Voxel (V × V) Single-Point Calibration in Whole-Body Zebrafish by IR-MALDESI Quantitative MSI.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2026Article
- Exploring ammonium salt doping to enhance ion abundance for quantitative mass spectrometry imaging.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Demonstrating voxel-by-voxel (V × V) single-point calibration in liver tissue by IR-MALDESI quantitative MSI.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Subcellular-Resolution Molecular Pathology by Laser Ablation-Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI) uses an infrared laser to desorb neutral biomolecules with postionization via ESI at atmospheric pressure. The Gaussian profile of the laser with conventional optics results in the heating of adjacent nonablated tissue due to the energy profile being circular. A diffractive optical element (DOE) was incorporated into the optical train to correct for this disadvantage. The DOE produces a top-hat beam profile and square ablation spots, which have uniform energy distributions. Although beneficial to mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), it is unknown how the DOE affects the ability to perform quantitative MSI (qMSI). In this work, we evaluate the performance of the DOE optical train against our conventional optics to define the potential advantages of the top-hat beam profile. Absolute quantification of glutathione (GSH) was achieved by normalizing the analyte of interest to homoglutathione (hGSH), spotting a dilution series of stable isotope labeled glutathione (SIL-GSH), and analyzing by IR-MALDESI MSI with either the conventional optical train or with the DOE incorporated. Statistical comparison indicates that there was no significant difference between the quantification of GSH by the two optical trains as evidenced by similar calibration curves. Results support that both optical trains can be used for qMSI without a change in the ability to carry out absolute quantification but providing the benefits of the top-hat optical train (i.e., flat energy profile and square ablation spots)-for future qMSI studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.