Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291750›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2025

Partners in progress: Advancing dementia research through collaboration.

John Roth, Cathy Roth Oam, Anita My Goh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John RothProfessionals with Alzheimer's and related diseases (PALZ), Australia.
Cathy Roth OamProfessionals with Alzheimer's and related diseases (PALZ), Australia.
Anita My GohThe University of Melbourne, Australia; National Ageing Research Institute, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0159-5926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lived experience of dementia, the views of the caregiver, and the pursuit of scientific understanding by researchers need to converge for holistic and collaborative action to improve dementia research. However, there often exist silos and division between these groups, which limits relevance and innovation. This paper aims to bridge this divide by offering a tripartite exploration of dementia research through three distinct, yet interconnected, lenses of a person living with the disease, their dedicated carer, and a researcher actively engaged in dementia research. This collaborative endeavour highlights the need to move beyond the traditional (and outdated) dichotomy of "subject and expert". By weaving together personal perspectives and insights in a multi-voiced approach, we highlight the opportunities and potential that can emerge from working in partnership and using a relational approach.

Indexed as

CaregiversCooperative BehaviorDementiaBiomedical ResearchHumansResearch Personneldementiainclusionrelationalrelationshipsresearch partnerships

Identifiers

PMID39291750
PMCPMC11667954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.