Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291746›Full record

ArticleJournal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists2026

Clinical Outcomes of 5000 IU Heparin Versus Activated Clotting Time-Guided Heparinization During Noncardiac Arterial Procedures: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Max Hoebink, Liliane C Roosendaal, Marie-José Beverloo, Arno M Wiersema, T van der Ploeg, Thomas A H Steunenberg, Kak Khee Yeung, Vincent Jongkind

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Max HoebinkDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5059-0107
Liliane C RoosendaalDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie-José BeverlooDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arno M WiersemaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T van der PloegFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas A H SteunenbergDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-5483-7826
Kak Khee YeungDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-286X
Vincent JongkindDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0129-1607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies have shown that activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization leads to better anticoagulation levels during noncardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) than a standardized bolus of 5000 IU. Better anticoagulation should potentially result in lower incidence of thrombo-embolic complications (TEC). Comparative investigations on clinical outcomes of these heparinization strategies are scarce. This study investigated clinical outcomes of ACT-guided heparinization with a starting dose of 100 IU/kg in comparison with a single standardized bolus of 5000 IU heparin during NCAP. MATERIALS AND

methodsAnalysis from a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing NCAP in 2 vascular centers was performed. Patients receiving ACT-guided heparinization were matched 1:1 with patients receiving 5000 IU heparin using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary outcomes were TEC, bleeding complications, and mortality within 30 days of procedure or during the same admission.

resultsA total of 759 patients (5000 IU heparin: 213 patients, ACT-guided heparinization: 546 patients) were included. Propensity score matching resulted in 209 patients in each treatment group. After PSM, the groups were comparable, with the exception of a higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in the ACT-guided heparinization group (103 patients, 49% vs 82 patients, 39%, p=0.039). The target ACT (>200 seconds) was reached in 198 patients (95%) of the ACT-guided group versus 71 patients (34%) of the 5000 IU group (p<0.001), indicating successful execution of the ACT-guided protocol. Incidence of TEC (13 patients, 6.2% vs 10 patients, 4.8%, p=0.52), mortality (3 patients, 1.4% vs 0 patients, p=0.25), and bleeding complications (32 patients, 15% vs 25 patients, 12%, p=0.32) did not differ between patients receiving ACT-guided heparinization and 5000 IU heparin. Protamine was administered in 118 patients (57%) in the ACT group versus 11 patients (5.3%) in the 5000 IU group (p<0.001), but did not influence incidence of TEC (17 patients, 5.9% vs 6 patients, 4.7%, p=0.61) or bleeding complications (34 patients, 12% vs 22 patients, 17%, p=0.14).

conclusionNo difference in TEC, bleeding complications, or mortality was found between ACT-guided heparinization and a single bolus of 5000 IU heparin during NCAP.Clinical ImpactPrevious studies have shown that activated clotting time (ACT)-guided heparinization leads to better anticoagulation levels during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) then a standardized bolus of 5000 IU. Comparative investigations on clinical outcomes are scarce. This study focussed on clinical outcomes of both protocols in NCAP in a propensity score matched cohort. Thrombo-embolic complications (TEC), bleeding complications and mortality within 30 days after NCAP or during the same admission were comparable between groups. Future studies should focus on optimizing ACT-guided protocols, specifically in patients with a high risk of TEC and bleeding complications.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationEndovascular ProceduresHeparinThromboembolismAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsHeparinactivated clotting timeanticoagulationheparinpropensity score matchingvascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID39291746
PMCPMC12972097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.