Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291560›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2024

Capturing the clinical complexity in young people presenting to primary mental health services: a data-driven approach.

Caroline X Gao, Nic Telford, Kate M Filia, Jana M Menssink, Sabina Albrecht, Patrick D McGorry, Matthew Hamilton, Mengmeng Wang, Daniel Gan, Dominic Dwyer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Caroline X GaoCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-2759
Nic Telfordheadspace, National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kate M FiliaCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-5890
Jana M MenssinkCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sabina Albrechtheadspace, National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Patrick D McGorryCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Matthew HamiltonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-9194
Mengmeng WangCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Daniel GanCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Dominic DwyerCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sophie ProberOrygen, Parkville, VIC,Australia.
Isabel ZbukvicCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Myriam ZiouCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sue M CottonCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9386-8348
Debra J Rickwoodheadspace, National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe specific and multifaceted service needs of young people have driven the development of youth-specific integrated primary mental healthcare models, such as the internationally pioneering

methodsThis retrospective study involved analysis of

resultsA total of 81,622 episodes of care from 76,021 young people across 113 services were analysed. Around 20% of young people clustered into a 'high complexity' group, presenting with a variety of complexity factors, including severe disorders, a trauma history and psychosocial impairments. Two moderate complexity groups were identified representing 'distress complexity' and 'psychosocial complexity' (about 20% each). Compared with the 'distress complexity' group, young people in the 'psychosocial complexity' group presented with a higher proportion of education, employment and housing issues in addition to psychological distress, and had lower levels of service engagement. The distribution of complexity profiles also varied across different

conclusionsThe proposed data-driven complexity model offers valuable insights for clinical planning and resource allocation. The identified groups highlight the importance of adopting a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to address the diverse factors contributing to clinical complexity. The large number of young people presenting with moderate-to-high complexity to

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareAdolescentAustraliaChildFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultadolescentcomplexityepisode of caremental healthmental health services

Identifiers

PMID39291560
PMCPMC11450420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.