Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291498›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Online Personal Training in Patients With Marfan Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study of Its Impact on Quality of Life and Physical Capacity.

Steeve Jouini, Olivier Milleron, Ludivine Eliahou, Guillaume Jondeau, Damien Vitiello

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04553094 (Evaluation of the Effects of Personalized Training at Home Combining Endurance and Resistance in Patients Suffering From Marfan Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04553094 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of the Effects of Personalized Training at Home Combining Endurance and Resistance in Patients Suffering From Marfan Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrench Cardiology SocietyRan2021 to 2022Enrolled72ConditionsMarfan SyndromeArmsEndurance training, Muscle building training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Skeletal muscle alterations in Marfan syndrome: a systematic review.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steeve JouiniUniversité Paris Cité, URP 3625-Institut des Sciences du Sport Santé de Paris (I3SP) Paris France.ORCID 0000-0001-7908-9818
Olivier MilleronCentre national de référence pour le syndrome de Marfan et pathologies apparentés Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat Paris France.ORCID 0000-0002-6517-0559
Ludivine EliahouCentre national de référence pour le syndrome de Marfan et pathologies apparentés Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat Paris France.ORCID 0000-0002-2995-804X
Guillaume JondeauCentre national de référence pour le syndrome de Marfan et pathologies apparentés Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bichat Paris France.ORCID 0000-0002-0101-2076
Damien VitielloUniversité Paris Cité, URP 3625-Institut des Sciences du Sport Santé de Paris (I3SP) Paris France.ORCID 0000-0003-3048-1880

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarfan syndrome (MFS) is a genetic disorder affecting the vascular and musculoskeletal systems. Limited knowledge exists regarding the exercise benefits for this population. This study aimed to explore the impact of a structured exercise program on the quality of life (QoL) and physical capabilities of patients with MFS. METHODS AND

resultsThis was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients with MFS were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a training group or a control group. The trial included a 3-month online supervised training program. Seventy patients with MFS were compared with healthy subjects. They were randomized into a training group (MFS-T) and a control group (MFS-C). The training consisted of 2 supervised online sessions weekly for 3 months. The primary outcome was QoL, assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 questionnaire. Baseline QoL in all dimensions was lower in patients with MFS. Their peak oxygen uptake was 25% lower, and muscle elasticity was diminished compared with healthy subjects. Postintervention, significant improvements were observed in the MFS-T group relative to the MFS-C group: QoL (+20.2±14.3 versus +0.7±0.5), peak oxygen uptake (+34% versus +14%), muscle elasticity index (11.5±8.2 versus +1.2±1.7), reduced blood pressures during isometric squats (systolic -19±30 versus 0±6; diastolic -27±39 versus +2±15), and reduced pulse wave velocity at rest (-1.20±1.89 versus -0.40±1.61) and postexercise (-0.42±0.45 versus +0.08±0.48). The aortic diameter remained stable in both groups (MFS-T-0.19±1.1 versus MFS-C+0.11±0.78). After training, QoL remained lower in MFS-T than in healthy subjects, but peak oxygen uptake, pulse wave velocity at rest, and postexercise were similar to those of healthy subjects.

conclusionsThe 3-month online training program significantly enhanced QoL and cardiovascular/muscular metrics in patients with MFS without affecting aortic root diameter, suggesting its potential as part of a management strategy for MFS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04553094.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyExercise ToleranceMarfan SyndromeQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansInternet-Based InterventionMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adulte‐rehabilitationexerciseMarfan syndromepersonalized training

Identifiers

PMID39291498
PMCPMC11681478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.