Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291423›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2024

Discordant Wada and fMRI language lateralization: a case report.

Yu Peng, Jiwen Xu, Zhaoxin Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu PengKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (MOE and Shanghai), Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jiwen XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhaoxin WangKey Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics (MOE and Shanghai), Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) is gaining importance in the preoperative assessment of language for presurgical planning. However, inconsistencies with the Wada test might arise. This current case report describes a very rare case of an epileptic patient who exhibited bilateral distribution (right > left) in the inferior frontal gyrus (laterality index [LI] = -0.433) and completely right dominance in the superior temporal gyrus (LI = -1). However, the Wada test revealed a dissociation: his motor speech was located in the left hemisphere, while he could understand vocal instructions with his right hemisphere. A clinical implication is that the LIs obtained by fMRI should be cautiously used to determine Broca's area in atypical patients; for example, even when complete right dominance is found in the temporal cortex in right-handed patients. Theoretically, as the spatially separated functions of motor speech and language comprehension (by the combined results of fMRI and Wada) can be further temporally separated (by the intracarotid amobarbital procedure) in this case report, these findings might provide direct support to Broca's initial conclusions that Broca's area is associated with acquired motor speech impairment, but not language comprehension

Indexed as

Functional LateralityLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrain MappingBroca AreaEpilepsyHumansMaleSpeechTemporal LobeBroca’s areacase reportfMRIlaterality indexWada

Identifiers

PMID39291423
PMCPMC11418432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.