Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291340›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025

Emergency Maternal Hospital Readmissions in the Postnatal Period: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Ruth V Pritchett, Gavin Rudge, Beck Taylor, Carole Cummins, Sara Kenyon, Ellie Jones, Sharon Morad, Christine MacArthur, Kate Jolly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruth V PritchettInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9958-1233
Gavin RudgeInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Beck TaylorWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Carole CumminsInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sara KenyonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ellie JonesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sharon MoradBirmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3041-236X
Christine MacArthurInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kate JollyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the change in English emergency postnatal maternal readmissions 2007-2017 (pre-COVID-19) and the association with maternal demographics, obstetric risk factors and postnatal length of stay (LOS).

designNational cohort study.

settingAll English National Health Service hospitals. POPULATION: A total of 6 192 140 women who gave birth in English NHS hospitals from April 2007 to March 2017.

methodsStatistical analysis using birth and readmission data from routinely collected National Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database.

main outcome measuresRate of emergency postnatal maternal hospital readmissions related to pregnancy or giving birth within 42 days postpartum, readmission diagnoses and association with maternal demographic factors, obstetric risk factors and postnatal LOS.

resultsA significant increase in the rate of emergency postnatal maternal readmissions from 15 128 (2.5%) in 2008 to 20 734 (3.4%) in 2016 (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.28-1.37) was found. Risk factors for readmission included minoritised ethnicity (particularly Black or Black British ethnicity: aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39); age < 20 years (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.12); 40+ years (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.10); primiparity (multiparity: aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.93); nonspontaneous vaginal birth modes (emergency caesarean: aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.82-1.90); longer LOS (4+ vs. 0 days: aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.53-1.64); and obstetric risk factors including urinary retention (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 2.06-2.53) and postnatal wound breakdown (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.83-2.21).

conclusionsThe concerning rise in emergency maternal readmissions should be addressed from a health inequalities perspective focusing on women from minoritised ethnic groups; those < 20 and ≥ 40 years old; primiparous women; and those with specified obstetric risk factors.

Indexed as

Length of StayPatient ReadmissionAdultCohort StudiesCOVID-19Emergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2State MedicineYoung Adultcohortmaternalpostnatalreadmission

Identifiers

PMID39291340
PMCPMC11625651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.