ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Research on design and control methods of a lightweight upper limb joint isokinetic rehabilitation training equipment.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Isokinetic exercise can improve joint muscle strength and stability, making it suitable for early rehabilitation of stroke patients. However, traditional isokinetic equipment is bulky and costly, and cannot effectively avoid external environmental interference. Methods: This paper designed a lightweight upper limb joint isokinetic rehabilitation training equipment, with a control system that includes a speed planning strategy and speed control with disturbance rejection. Based on the established human-machine kinematic closed-loop model between the equipment and the user, a dynamic evaluation method of torque at the joint level was proposed. Results: To validate the effectiveness of the equipment, experiments were conducted by manually applying random disturbances to the equipment operated at an isokinetic speed. The results showed that the root mean square error between the observed torque curve of the second-order linear extended state observer used in this paper and the actual disturbance curve was 0.52, and the maximum speed tracking error of the speed control algorithm was 1.27%. In fast and slow sinusoidal speed curve tracking experiments, the root mean square errors of the speed tracking results for this algorithm were 9.65 and 5.27, respectively, while the tracking errors for the PID speed control algorithm under the same environment were 19.94 and 12.11. Discussion: The research results indicate that compared with traditional PID control method, the proposed control strategy demonstrates superior performance in achieving isokinetic control and suppressing external disturbances, thereby exhibiting significant potential in promoting upper limb rehabilitation among patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.