ArticleCureus2024
Post-COVID-19 Yearly Pattern Changes and Gender Variations in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Patients at an Urban Mental Health Clinic in Alabama, USA.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patterns of prescription stimulant initiation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based time-series analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 era has seen an increased trend in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnoses. Historically, males have been diagnosed with ADHD more frequently than females during childhood. Studies have indicated a higher use of stimulant medications among male ADHD cases compared to females. This study examines ADHD cases from 2021 to 2023 to analyze yearly trends following the initial COVID-19 spike and explores gender and age differences between ADHD-positive and ADHD-negative cases. Methods This retrospective study was conducted using data from an urban outpatient mental health clinic in Alabama. Data were extracted from Electronic Health Records (EHR) for patients seen from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study under the exempt research category. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 26.0, Armonk, NY). Diagnoses were based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria, and clinical diagnoses and medication information were obtained from the EHR. Results The study included 1,422 patients, of whom 881 (62%) were diagnosed with ADHD. Females with ADHD had significantly higher comorbid conditions, such as major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder, compared to males with ADHD. Gender differences in ADHD diagnoses were seen over the years, though no significant age differences were observed. Conclusions The study indicates a sustained high rate of ADHD diagnoses even after the initial COVID-19 spike. Females showed a higher ADHD diagnoses compared to males, but stimulant medication use remained consistent across genders. No significant age differences were observed between males and females with ADHD. Further research is needed to explore the reasons behind these gender differences and to evaluate their implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.