Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291217›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2024

Exploring Novel Adverse Events of Nefecon.

Jingyu Wang, Zhao Zhang, Xingzi Liu, Sufang Shi, Jicheng Lv, Yuemiao Zhang, Hong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingyu WangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhao ZhangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xingzi LiuRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sufang ShiRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jicheng LvRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuemiao ZhangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hong ZhangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nefecon, the first innovative drug approved by both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency for IgA nephropathy (IgAN), lacked comprehensive real-world assessments of its adverse events (AEs). Methods: We leveraged postmarketing data of Nefecon from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), employing disproportionate analysis (DPA) to detect positive signals at the system organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PTs) levels. Duplicate AEs related to budesonide and those previously reported in studies were excluded through the use of the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Our analysis encompassed time-to-onset (TTO), Weibull shape parameter (WSP) evaluation, cumulative incidence, clinical prioritization evaluation, and subgroup analysis based on gender and age. Results: A total of 1515 individuals with IgAN were included. Five positive SOC signals and 23 positive PT signals were identified, including 4 PTs (asthenia, malaise, product dose omission issue, and anxiety) representing novel AEs newly identified in this study. None of the positive PTs were classified as high clinical priority, with only acne, hypertension, swelling face, and weight increased considered as moderate clinical priority events. The median time to TTO was 31 days. All WSP test results indicated an early failure type profile. Lastly, subgroup analysis provided further insights into the relative risk of specific AEs. Conclusion: Nefecon demonstrates a favorable safety profile, with no high-priority clinical events identified. The identification of novel AEs and subgroup-specific relative high-risk events fills a gap in existing studies and offers valuable insights for early clinical vigilance.

Indexed as

adverse eventsbudesonideFAERSIgA nephropathyNefeconpharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID39291217
PMCPMC11403076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.