ArticleKidney international reports2024
Gene Expression Sets and Renal Profiling from the Renal AL Amyloid Involvement and NEOD00 (RAIN) Trial.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03168906 (The RAIN Study, a Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Phase 2b Study of NEOD001 in Previously Treated Subjects With Systemic Light-chain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The RAIN Study, a Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Phase 2b Study of NEOD001 in Previously Treated Subjects With Systemic Light-chain (AL) Amyloidosis and Persistent Renal Involvement
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: There is an unmet need to understand the mechanisms by which amyloid deposition drives alterations in the kidney. We leveraged renal biopsies from amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis participants of the Renal AL Amyloid Involvement and NEOD00 (RAIN) trial (NCT03168906) to perform transcriptional profiling and to employ a novel histologic scoring tool. Our objective was to utilize a transcriptome-driven approach to identify AL molecular signatures that may be prognostic. Methods: Clinical data were correlated to histologic and molecular findings. A composite scarring injury and amyloid score (AS) were assigned to each biopsy. Glomerular and tubulointerstitial (TI) compartments were microdissected and sequenced separately. Expression data were compared to healthy living donors and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) profiles. Differentially expressed genes were determined. Results: Cluster analysis revealed 2 distinct patient clusters (G1 and G2) based on gene expression. The AS was higher in the TI compartment (6.5 vs. 4.5; Conclusion: Despite the small sample size, we identified 2 distinct groups of patients with AL based on molecular signatures. Detailed studies of a larger cohort encompassing omics technologies at a single cell resolution will further help to identify the response of individual kidney cell types to amyloid deposits, potentially leading to the development of novel therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.