Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291181›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2024

Lodestar DX, an evaluation: loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in symptomatic adult females.

Joanna Diggle, Ayako Van Der Goes Van Naters, Mohammed Ali Roula, Shanine Mitchell, Dewi Whiffen, Jeroen Nieuwland, Emma Hayhurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanna DigglePublic Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0008-6611
Ayako Van Der Goes Van NatersLlusern Scientific Limited, Cardiff Edge Business Park, Longwood Drive, Cardiff CF14 7YU, Wales.
Mohammed Ali RoulaUniversity of South Wales, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, Wales.
Shanine MitchellPublic Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales.
Dewi WhiffenLlusern Scientific Limited, Cardiff Edge Business Park, Longwood Drive, Cardiff CF14 7YU, Wales.
Jeroen NieuwlandUniversity of South Wales, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, Wales.
Emma HayhurstLlusern Scientific Limited, Cardiff Edge Business Park, Longwood Drive, Cardiff CF14 7YU, Wales.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-2206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over 404.6 million people are affected worldwide each year by urinary tract infections (UTIs), with ∼237 000 associated deaths globally in 2019. Much more common in women than men, acute UTI occurs in up to 50% of the female population. Despite this, there is a lack of good diagnostic tools for use at the point-of-care, and over- and under-diagnosis are common, leading to long-term complications and patient suffering, and driving the spread of antimicrobial resistance through insufficient appropriate antibiotic stewardship. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a novel point-of-care testing platform, Lodestar DX, in comparison with standard laboratory processing of urine specimens. Methods: A total of 199 fresh urine samples from symptomatic adult females suspected of having an acute UTI were tested using Lodestar DX and the results compared with standard laboratory methods performed at a local microbiology laboratory. Results: Using standard laboratory methods, 129/199 samples produced a result and could be compared. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Lodestar DX were 88.1% (95% CI: 77.8%-94.7%) and 83.9% (95% CI: 72.3%-92.0%), respectively ( Conclusions: The results show good correlation between Lodestar DX results and those of the standard laboratory method for this patient group. However, the platform would benefit from further testing to establish its true point-of-care compatibility and a direct comparison between this and other testing methods, such as urine dipstick testing.

Identifiers

PMID39291181
PMCPMC11406545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.