Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39291149›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Combination of machine learning algorithms with natural language processing may increase the probability of bacteremia detection in the emergency department: A retrospective, big-data analysis of 94,482 patients.

Gal Ben-Haim, Mika Yosef, Eyade Rowand, Jonathan Ben-Yosef, Aya Berman, Sigal Sina, Nitsan Halabi, Eitan Grossbard, Yehonatan Marziano, Gad Segal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gal Ben-HaimEmergency Department, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Mika YosefARC, Innovation Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Eyade RowandThe Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Jonathan Ben-YosefOrt Melton High School, Bat-Yam, Israel.
Aya BermanDan Petah-Tikvah District, Clalit Health Services, Dan, Israel.
Sigal SinaARC, Innovation Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Nitsan HalabiARC, Innovation Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Eitan GrossbardKaplan Medical Center, St George's University of London, program delivered by University of Nicosia at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Yehonatan MarzianoBarzilai Medical Center. St George's University of London, program delivered by University of Nicosia at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0526-9645
Gad SegalThe Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3851-3245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prompt diagnosis of bacteremia in the emergency department (ED) is of utmost importance. Nevertheless, the average time to first clinical laboratory finding range from 1 to 3 days. Alongside a myriad of scoring systems for occult bacteremia prediction, efforts for applying artificial intelligence (AI) in this realm are still preliminary. In the current study we combined an AI algorithm with a Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm that would potentially increase the yield extracted from clinical ED data. Methods: This study involved adult patients who visited our emergency department and at least one blood culture was taken to rule out bacteremia. Using both tabular and free text data, we built an ensemble model that leverages XGBoost for structured data, and logistic regression (LR) on a word-analysis technique called bag-of-words (BOW) Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), for textual data. All algorithms were designed in order to predict the risk for bacteremia with ED patients whose blood cultures were sent to the laboratory. Results: The study cohort comprised 94,482 individuals, of whom 52% were males. The prevalence of bacteremia in the entire cohort was 9.7%. The model trained on the tabular data yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 73.7% for XGBoost, while the LR that was trained on the free text achieved an AUC of 71.3%. After checking a range of weights, the best combination was for 55% weight on the XGBoost prediction and 45% weight on the LR prediction. The final model prediction yielded an AUC of 75.6%. Conclusion: Harnessing artificial intelligence to the task of bacteremia surveillance in the ED settings by a combination of both free text and tabular data analysis improved predictive performance compared to using tabular data alone. We recommend that future AI applications based on our findings should be assimilated into the clinical routines of ED physicians.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBacteremiadiagnosisemergency departmentnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID39291149
PMCPMC11406632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.