ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Comparison of Subjective and Biomechanical Outcomes Between Proprioceptive Training and Modified Broström-Gould Surgery for Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Suture Button Fixation for Syndesmotic Injury in Elite Athletes With Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Prospective Case Series.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Gait study of surgical treatment and conservative treatment of acute ankle sprain: a single-center cohort study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both proprioceptive training and modified Broström-Gould surgery can improve ankle stability in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI), but further biomechanical evaluation is necessary to determine the optimal treatment. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes and biomechanical changes after proprioceptive training versus modified Broström-Gould surgery in patients with CAI. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 56 patients with CAI were assigned randomly to either a nonoperative group (n = 28) who underwent 3 months of proprioceptive training or an operative group (n = 28) who underwent modified Broström-Gould surgery. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores, foot pressure during walking, center of pressure (COP) velocity, and time for the COP to reach the balance boundary (time to boundary [TTB]) during single-leg standing were collected before the intervention (baseline) and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare group differences and changes over time. Results: The nonoperative group had significant improvements from baseline in FAAM-Sports score and significantly decreased TTB in both the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions at all timepoints, while the operative group showed significant improvements only in FAAM-Sports scores and TTB and COP velocity in the anterior-posterior direction at 6 and 12 months postintervention. During walking, the nonoperative group had significantly increased peak force under the medial foot at 3 months, which dropped back to baseline levels at 12 months, while the operative group had significantly increased peak force under the medial midfoot and hindfoot that persisted until 12 months ( Conclusion: In this study, both proprioceptive training and modified Broström-Gould surgery led to improved subjective functional scores, foot pressure distribution during walking, and postural stability during standing for patients with CAI but with different biomechanical patterns. Proprioceptive training led to an earlier recovery of sports function and better medial-lateral stability recovery, while surgery provided more persistent results. Registration: ChiCTR1900023999 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.