ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024
Clavicular tunnel widening in chronic acromioclavicular joint instabilities after primary versus revision arthroscopically-assisted acromio- and coracoclavicular stabilization.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immediate radiographic reduction loss but preserved clinical outcomes after hardware removal in lateral clavicle fractures treated with plate fixation and coracoclavicular augmentation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- [Comparative study of orthopaedic robot-assisted and arthroscopy-assisted treatment of Rockwood typeZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- The association of clavicular, coracoidal and coracoclavicular radiographic tunnel position with loss of reduction after bidirectional acromioclavicular joint stabilization.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Clavicular tunnel widening in chronic acromioclavicular joint instabilities after primary versus revision arthroscopically-assisted acromio- and coracoclavicular stabilization.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate joint reduction (loss of reduction [LOR]; dynamic posterior translation [DPT]) and clavicular tunnel widening (cTW) in patients treated with arthroscopically-assisted acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization after previously failed nonoperative versus surgical treatment. Methods: Patients undergoing arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization (bidirectional tendon allograft with a low-profile TightRope) after previously failed nonoperative versus surgical treatment were included retrospectively. Bilateral anteroposterior stress views served for evaluating LOR (side-comparative coracoclavicular distance [CCD]) and cTW at a 6-weeks- and 6-months-follow-up (FU) and for evaluating the filling ratio (FR, vertical device insertion depth relative to clavicle height) at the 6-weeks-FU. Postoperative DPT was assessed on Alexander's views. Results: Twenty-seven patients (20 male, mean age 46.1 ± 14.8 years) were included (prior treatment: nonoperative: Conclusion: Patients undergoing arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization for chronic bidirectional ACJ instabilities showed comparable radiologic results after previous nonoperative versus surgical treatment. cTW increased towards the inferior cortex and was associated with recurrent vertical and horizontal instability, related to a smaller FR. More research into reduced cTW, for example, by a more filling device, should be performed. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.