Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290983›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2024

A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence for pharmacology research.

Bing Li, Kan Tan, Angelyn R Lao, Haiying Wang, Huiru Zheng, Le Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Integrative deep learning strategies to enhance early-stage drug discovery: optimizing computational structure-activity modeling for pharmacotherapeutic innovation.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bing LiCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Kan TanCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Angelyn R LaoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Haiying WangSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Huiru ZhengSchool of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Le ZhangCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the innovation and advancement of artificial intelligence, more and more artificial intelligence techniques are employed in drug research, biomedical frontier research, and clinical medicine practice, especially, in the field of pharmacology research. Thus, this review focuses on the applications of artificial intelligence in drug discovery, compound pharmacokinetic prediction, and clinical pharmacology. We briefly introduced the basic knowledge and development of artificial intelligence, presented a comprehensive review, and then summarized the latest studies and discussed the strengths and limitations of artificial intelligence models. Additionally, we highlighted several important studies and pointed out possible research directions.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical pharmacologycompound pharmacokinetic predictiondrug discoverypharmacology

Identifiers

PMID39290983
PMCPMC11405247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.