ArticleCureus2024
Step-by-Step Implementation of Three-Dimensional Print Technology in Preoperative Neurosurgery Planning.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Realistic 3D-Printed Lumbar Spine Model for Non-cadaveric Surgical Training: A Proof of Concept Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a detailed methodology for integrating three-dimensional (3D) printing technology into preoperative planning in neurosurgery. The increasing capabilities of 3D printing over the last decade have made it a valuable tool in medical fields such as orthopedics and dental practices. Neurosurgery can similarly benefit from these advancements, though the creation of accurate 3D models poses a significant challenge due to the technical expertise required and the cost of specialized software. This paper demonstrates a step-by-step process for developing a 3D physical model for preoperative planning using free, open-source software. A case involving a 62-year-old male with a large infiltrating tumor in the sacrum, originating from renal cell carcinoma, is used to illustrate the method. The process begins with the acquisition of a CT scan, followed by image reconstruction using InVesalius 3, an open-source software. The resulting 3D model is then processed in Autodesk Meshmixer (Autodesk, Inc., San Francisco, CA), where individual anatomical structures are segmented and prepared for printing. The model is printed using the Bambu Lab X1 Carbon 3D printer (Bambu Lab, Austin, TX), allowing for multicolor differentiation of structures such as bones, tumors, and blood vessels. The study highlights the practical aspects of model creation, including artifact removal, surface separation, and optimization for print volume. It discusses the advantages of multicolor printing for visual clarity in surgical planning and compares it with monochromatic and segmented printing approaches. The findings underscore the potential of 3D printing to enhance surgical precision and planning, providing a replicable protocol that leverages accessible technology. This work supports the broader adoption of 3D printing in neurosurgery, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between medical and engineering professionals to maximize the utility of these models in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.