Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290910›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

MRI Evaluation of Traumatic and Non-traumatic Pathologies of the Ankle Joint and Hindfoot: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Anuradha Kelkar, Ojasvi Sharma, Saksham Jain, Sayali Paidlewar, Ankita Pandey, Sravya Julakanti, Akhil Varma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anuradha KelkarDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Ojasvi SharmaDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Saksham JainDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Sayali PaidlewarDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Ankita PandeyDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Sravya JulakantiDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Akhil VarmaDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pathologies affecting the ankle joint and hindfoot can present with a variety of clinical symptoms and etiologies, necessitating accurate diagnostic tools for effective management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable imaging modality for assessing these pathologies, providing detailed visualization of bone, joint, tendon, and other soft tissue abnormalities. Objectives To evaluate MRI findings in a diverse cohort of 105 participants with pathologies affecting the ankle joint and hindfoot, focusing on the prevalence and types of bone, joint, tendon, and soft tissue abnormalities. Materials and methods A single-center observational descriptive study was conducted at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India, over a period from August 2022 to July 2024, involving 105 participants (54.3% male, 45.7% female) with a mean age of 39.04 years. MRI scans were analyzed to assess the prevalence of bone, joint, tendon, and soft tissue pathologies. Clinical profiles, symptom duration, and etiological classifications were documented. Results Analysis of the results obtained from 105 (N = 105) study participants revealed that pain (94.3%, or 99 cases) was the most common symptom, followed by restricted movement (86.7%, or 91 cases), trauma history (75.2%, or 79 cases), and swelling (73.3%, or 77 cases). Traumatic causes (76.2%, or 80 cases) predominated, while inflammatory (48.3%, or 14 cases) and infective (34.5%, or 10 cases) causes were also significant. MRI findings showed marrow edema in 41.9%, or 44 cases, subchondral cysts in 22.9% (24 cases), fractures in 17.1% (18 cases), and erosions in 10.5% of participants (11 cases). Joint involvement was most frequent in the tibiotalar (76.2%, or 80 cases) and subtalar joints (58.1%, or 61 cases). Tendon pathologies included peritendonitis (55.2%, or 58 cases) and tendinosis (23.8%, or 25 cases), with the Achilles tendon being the most frequently affected (39%, or 41 cases). Ligament injuries were predominantly sprains (46.7%, or 49 cases), with less frequent partial (18.1%, or 19 cases) and complete tears (7.6%, or eight cases). Soft tissue findings included subcutaneous edema (76.2%, or 80 cases) and bursitis (24.8%, or 26 cases). Among the study participants who presented with non-traumatic pathologies, inflammatory pathologies (48.3%, or 14 cases) were the most common, followed by infective (34.5%, or 10 cases) and neoplastic (17.2%, or five cases) pathologies. Conclusion MRI effectively identifies a wide range of pathologies in the ankle and hindfoot, with marrow edema, joint effusion, and tendon pathologies being prevalent. The study underscores the utility of MRI in diagnosing and assessing various conditions in the ankle joint complex and highlights the need for accurate imaging to guide treatment decisions. Future research should focus on correlating MRI findings with clinical outcomes to enhance diagnostic accuracy and management strategies.

Indexed as

ankle jointankle joint-foothind footimaging findingsmagnetic resonance imaging (mri)

Identifiers

PMID39290910
PMCPMC11407759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.