ArticlePlant diversity2024
Genomic divergence and mutation load in the
Article in Plant diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic diversity and population structure of wild and cultivated Camellia tetracocca Chang assessed by ILP markers: insights for conservation of an endangered tea species.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Speciation, endangerment and adaptation in limestone rocky environment ofPlant diversity · 2026Article
- High-quality genome ofPlant diversity · 2026Article
- Genomic insights into the survival code of karst plants.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level genome assembly and population genomics analysis ofPlant diversity · 2026Article
- Geographic isolation shapes the genetic landscape of the threatened karst-endemic plantFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Genomic and population genomic analyses reveal contrasting diversity and demographic histories in a critically endangered and a widespreadPlant diversity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding genome-wide diversity, inbreeding, and the burden of accumulated deleterious mutations in small and isolated populations is essential for predicting and enhancing population persistence and resilience. However, these effects are rarely studied in limestone karst plants. Here, we re-sequenced the nuclear genomes of 62 individuals of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.