Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290852›Full record

ArticleAssistive technology outcomes and benefits2024

Actual and Preferred Methods for Learning to Use Assistive Technology.

Michele C McDonnall, Anne Steverson, Jamie Boydstun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assistive technology outcomes and benefits, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Factors Associated with Proficient Braille Skills.Journal of visual impairment & blindness · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michele C McDonnallThe National Research & Training Center on Blindness & Low Vision, Mississippi State University.
Anne SteversonThe National Research & Training Center on Blindness & Low Vision, Mississippi State University.
Jamie BoydstunThe National Research & Training Center on Blindness & Low Vision, Mississippi State University.

Funding

ACL HHS 90RTEM0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the preferred and actual methods for learning assistive technology (AT) by employed individuals who are blind or have low vision. Hands-on training was the preferred method for learning to use new AT, particularly among those who lost vision later in life. However, most participants considered self-training as their primary actual learning method. The findings indicate a need for more formal training opportunities and suggest a gap between this need and the availability of training by qualified professionals. The findings also suggest content to incorporate into formal training, including utilizing mobile apps, developing problem-solving skills, and locating and using training resources available online. AT trainers should emphasize to their students the ongoing, life-long learning needed to maintain and enhance AT skills and knowledge.

Indexed as

assistive technologyblindemploymentlow visiontraining

Identifiers

PMID39290852
PMCPMC11404533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.