Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290823›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024

Impact of Gender on Patient Experiences of Self-Management in Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.

Anna Ramírez-Morros, Anna Berenguera, Laura Millaruelo, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Carmen Gomez Garcia, Xavier Cos, Luis Ávila Lachica, Sara Artola, Jose Manuel Millaruelo, Didac Mauricio and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Invisible Labor: Gendered Responsibilities and Women's Diabetes Management.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna Ramírez-Morros *DAP-Cat Group, Unitat de Suport a la Recerca de la Catalunya Central, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Sant Fruitós de Bages, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8263-1292
Anna Berenguera *Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-2002
Laura Millaruelored GDPS Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Pilar Buil-Cosialesred GDPS Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Carmen Gomez Garciared GDPS Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Xavier Cosred GDPS Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Luis Ávila Lachicared GDPS Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Sara Artolared GDPS Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Jose Manuel Millaruelored GDPS Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Didac MauricioDAP-Cat Group, Unitat de Suport a la Recerca de la Catalunya Central, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Sant Fruitós de Bages, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-0250
Josep Franch-NadalDAP-Cat Group, Unitat de Suport a la Recerca de la Catalunya Central, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Sant Fruitós de Bages, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5175-1555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify gender disparities in knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to self-management and control of Type 2 diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) among primary care patients. The research was conducted across multiple Spanish cities. Patients and Methods: The study involved 8 Primary Care Centres located in four distinct regions of Spain: East (Barcelona), Centre (Madrid), North (Pamplona and Zumaia) and South (Vélez-Málaga and Málaga). A total of 111 individuals diagnosed with T2DM, comprising 52 women and 59 men, participated in 12 group discussions at these primary healthcare centers from February to June 2015. Participation was voluntary, and all participants provided informed consent by signing the consent form. A qualitative hermeneutic phenomenological study with a maximum variation sample was done. Participant profiles were defined based on gender, age, place of residence, type of treatment, years living with T2DM and the presence or absence of a cardiovascular event. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Participants were aware that diabetes is a chronic condition, with varied levels of concern regarding the diagnosis. Participants' locus of control influenced their perception of the disease's cause, with women attributing it to stress and emotional situations, while men linked it to risky behaviors. Self-management strategies were shaped by beliefs about diabetes, with both genders facing challenges in implementing recommended practices. Gender differences were also evident in caregiving roles, with men receiving more family support for diet adherence, while women prioritized family needs over their self-care. Participants expressed satisfaction with professional-patient interactions but highlighted the need for more accessible information and specialist care, suggesting support groups for women and clear health guidelines for men. Conclusion: Gender differences significantly influence how patients perceive and manage type 2 diabetes, with women experiencing greater concern and care burden compared to men. Effective diabetes management requires tailored support that addresses these gender-specific challenges. Enhancing healthcare services with clear guidelines and support groups can improve self-management outcomes in both men and women.

Indexed as

genderpersonal experienceself-caretype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID39290823
PMCPMC11407317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.