ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Sex-Related Differences in Left Ventricular Geometry Patterns in Patients With Arterial Hypertension.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional Structural Echocardiographic Patterns and Risk Score for Prognostic Stratification in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance characteristics and prognostic associations of hypertension-mediated left ventricular hypertrophy.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Hypertension and left ventricular geometry: Diagnosis, prognosis, and management.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- Determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy in a cohort attending a medical clinic: A comparative analysis stratified by sex.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Left Ventricular Mass-to-Strain Ratio to Predict Change in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Prognosis in Hypertensive Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Hypertensive Heart Disease in the Nigerian Population: Prevalence, Phenotypes, and Cardiovascular Comorbidities.Cureus · 2025Article
- The Pandora's Box of Hypertensive Heart Disease in Women.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sex-specific differences in left ventricular (LV) geometry might help in developing tailored strategies for hypertension management. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate sex-related differences in LV geometry at baseline and over time in hypertension. Methods: From a prospective registry, we included hypertensives without prevalent cardiovascular disease, incident myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease > stage III, and with normal LV ejection fraction. LV mass index >115 g/m Results: Six thousand four hundred twenty-seven patients (age 53 ± 11 years, 43% females) were included. At baseline, females showed lower prevalence of normal geometric pattern and higher prevalence of LVH than males (50% vs 72%, Conclusions: We found sex-related differences in LV geometry among hypertensives. Females have higher risk of LV remodeling at baseline compared with males, with differences persisting at long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.