Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290662›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Sampling fish gut microbiota - A genome-resolved metagenomic approach.

Eiríkur A Thormar, Søren B Hansen, Louise von Gersdorff Jørgensen, Morten T Limborg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eiríkur A ThormarGlobe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen K Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3897-5981
Søren B HansenGlobe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen K Denmark.
Louise von Gersdorff JørgensenSection for Parasitology and Aquatic Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg C Denmark.
Morten T LimborgGlobe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen K Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a surge in microbiota-focused studies in teleosts, few have reported functional data on whole metagenomes as it has proven difficult to extract high biomass microbial DNA from fish intestinal samples. The zebrafish is a promising model organism in functional microbiota research, yet studies on the functional landscape of the zebrafish gut microbiota through shotgun based metagenomics remain scarce. Thus, a consensus on an appropriate sampling method accurately representing the zebrafish gut microbiota, or any fish species is lacking. Addressing this, we systematically tested four methods of sampling the zebrafish gut microbiota: collection of faeces from the tank, the whole gut, intestinal content, and the application of ventral pressure to facilitate extrusion of gut material. Additionally, we included water samples as an environmental control to address the potential influence of the environmental microbiota on each sample type. To compare these sampling methods, we employed a combination of genome-resolved metagenomics and 16S metabarcoding techniques. We observed differences among sample types on all levels including sampling, bioinformatic processing, metagenome co-assemblies, generation of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), functional potential, MAG coverage, and population level microdiversity. Comparison to the environmental control highlighted the potential impact of the environmental contamination on data interpretation. While all sample types tested are informative about the zebrafish gut microbiota, the results show that optimal sample type for studying fish microbiomes depends on the specific objectives of the study, and here we provide a guide on what factors to consider for designing functional metagenome-based studies on teleost microbiomes.

Indexed as

fish metagenomesgenome‐resolved metagenomicssampling fish microbiomesshotgun metagenomic sequencingzebrafish gut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID39290662
PMCPMC11407903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.