ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Machine-learning-derived online prediction models of outcomes for patients with cholelithiasis-induced acute cholangitis: development and validation in two retrospective cohorts.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global burden of subarachnoid hemorrhage in young adults, 1990-2021: disparities, risk factors, and projections to 2050.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model using routine laboratory biomarkers to stratify severe pneumonia risk in young children.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Explainable early prediction of short-term severe deterioration in gallstone-related biliary disease using MIMIC-IV, eICU, and local real-world data.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of machine learning models for clinical risk prediction on real-world hospital datasets.iScience · 2026Article
- Railway carbon emission scenario prediction in four regions of China based on machine learning.Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Risk Assessment of Myasthenia Gravis Onset in Thymoma Patients and Analysis of Their Correlations and Causal Relationships.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A machine learning model for diabetic retinopathy risk stratification using routine blood and urine parameters: insights into kidney-eye crosstalk.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted multidisciplinary therapy for a complex case of cholangitis with septic shock: a case report and simulated decision-making analysis.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Preoperative gut microbiota combined with machine learning for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of the Neutrophil‒Lymphocyte Ratio in the Risk Stratification and Prognosis for Patients with Acute Cholangitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Developing an explainable machine learning model using body composition to predict cardiovascular mortality in initial dialysis patients: a multicenter study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models based on blood routine tests and tumor markers in early screening of primary bronchogenic lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Predictors of intensive care unit admission rates in patients with acute cholangitis.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Association between SHR and mortality in critically ill patients with CVD: a retrospective analysis and machine learning approach.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable multi-task model to predict outcomes in patients with rhabdomyolysis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of a novel machine learning model for predicting severe pelvic endometriosis: A retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cholelithiasis-induced acute cholangitis (CIAC) is an acute inflammatory disease with poor prognosis. This study aimed to create machine-learning (ML) models to predict the outcomes of patients with CIAC. Methods: In this retrospective cohort and ML study, patients who met the both diagnosis of 'cholangitis' and 'calculus of gallbladder or bile duct' according to the International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9th revision, or met the diagnosis of 'calculus of bile duct with acute cholangitis with or without obstruction' according to the ICD 10th revision during a single hospitalization were included from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database, which records patient admissions to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, MA, USA, spanning June 1, 2001 to November 16, 2022. Patients who were neither admitted in an emergency department nor underwent biliary drainage within 24 h after admission, had an age of less than 18, or lost over 20% of the information were excluded. Nine ML methods, including the Logistic Regression, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Adaptive Boosting, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Support Vector Machine were applied for prediction of in-hospital mortality, re-admission within 30 days after discharge, and mortality within 180 days after discharge. Patients from Zhongda Hospital affiliated to Southeast University in China between January 1, 2019 and July 30, 2023 were enrolled as an external validation set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was the main index for model performance assessment. Findings: A total of 1156 patients were included to construct models. We performed stratified analyses on all patients, patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who underwent biliary drainage during ICU treatment. 13-16 features were selected from 186 variables for model training. The XGBoost method demonstrated the most optimal predictive efficacy, as evidenced by training set AUROC of 0.996 (95% CI NaN-NaN) for in-hospital mortality, 0.886 (0.862-0.910) for re-admission within 30 days after discharge, and 0.988 (0.982-0.995) for mortality within 180 days after discharge in all patients, 0.998 (NaN-NaN), 0.933 (0.909-0.957), and 0.988 (0.983-0.993) in patients admitted to the ICU, 0.987 (0.970-0.999), 0.908 (0.873-0.942), and 0.982 (0.971-0.993) in patients underwent biliary drainage during ICU treatment, respectively. Meanwhile, in the internal validation set, the AUROC reached 0.967 (0.933-0.998) for in-hospital mortality, 0.589 (0.502-0.677) for re-admission within 30 days after discharge, and 0.857 (0.782-0.933) for mortality within 180 days after discharge in all patients, 0.963 (NaN-NaN), 0.668 (0.486-0.851), and 0.864 (0.757-0.970) in patients admitted to the ICU, 0.961 (0.922-0.997), 0.669 (0.540-0.799), and 0.828 (0.730-0.925) in patients underwent biliary drainage during ICU treatment, respectively. The AUROC values of external validation set consisting of 61 patients were 0.741 (0.725-0.763), 0.812 (0.798-0.824), and 0.848 (0.841-0.859), respectively. Interpretation: The XGBoost models could be promising tools to predict outcomes in patients with CIAC, and had good clinical applicability. Multi-center validation with a larger sample size is warranted. Funding: The Technological Development Program of Nanjing Healthy Commission, and Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Jiangsu Province High-Level Hospital Construction Funds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.