Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290625›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2024

Real-world effectiveness of fidaxomicin in patients at high risk of

Benjamin Colwell, Jennifer Aguilar, Frances Hughes, Pavel Goriacko, Victor Chen, Mei Chang, Rachel Bartash, Yi Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effectiveness of fidaxomicin in preventing recurrence after initial community-associatedAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Trends and Efficacy in Clostridioides difficile Infection Management at a Polish Clinical Hospital.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin ColwellDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0305-9204
Jennifer AguilarDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Frances HughesDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Pavel GoriackoDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6875-3082
Victor ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mei ChangDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Rachel BartashDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Yi GuoDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-9507

Funding

Einstein-Montefiore Clinical and Translational Science Award HubUM1TR004400 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Jessica Kahn, Mimi Y Kim · 2023 to 2026
$17.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Compare the real-world impact of fidaxomicin (FDX) and vancomycin (VAN) on Design: A retrospective, matched-cohort study evaluating hospitalized patients with CDI from January 1, 2016, to November 1, 2022, within a tertiary academic medical center. Patients: Adult patients with at least 1 prior CDI case who received either FDX or VAN for non-fulminant CDI while admitted, and had at least 1 additional risk factor for recurrence. Risk factors included age >70, solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients, broad-spectrum antibiotic use within 30 days, or receipt of chemotherapy/immune-modulating agents within 30 days of admission. FDX and VAN patients were matched according to risk factors. Results: A total of 415 patient admissions were identified. After the exclusion of 92 patients for fulminant CDI, diarrhea from another cause, or use of VAN taper therapy, and 15 unmatched patients, 308 patient admissions were included (68 FDX and 240 VAN patients). There were no significant differences in 4-week recurrence (26% vs 23%; OR 1.1; Conclusions: In a real-world high-risk patient population, the use of FDX compared to oral VAN did not result in decreased CDI recurrence within 4 weeks or fewer hospital readmissions within 90 days. Further research is needed to better assess the value of FDX in this patient population.

Identifiers

PMID39290625
PMCPMC11406562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.