Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290601›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2024

Prediction of sepsis within 24 hours at the triage stage in emergency departments using machine learning.

Jingyuan Xie, Jiandong Gao, Mutian Yang, Ting Zhang, Yecheng Liu, Yutong Chen, Zetong Liu, Qimin Mei, Zhimao Li, Huadong Zhu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Early Sepsis Prediction: A Scoping Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jingyuan XieDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Jiandong GaoDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Mutian YangInstitute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100091, China.
Ting ZhangEmergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Yecheng LiuEmergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Yutong ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Zetong LiuDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Qimin MeiEmergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Zhimao LiEmergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Huadong ZhuEmergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China.
Ji WuDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is one of the main causes of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). Early prediction is critical for reducing injury. As approximately 36% of sepsis occur within 24 h after emergency department (ED) admission in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV), a prediction system for the ED triage stage would be helpful. Previous methods such as the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) are more suitable for screening than for prediction in the ED, and we aimed to find a light-weight, convenient prediction method through machine learning.

methodsWe accessed the MIMIC-IV for sepsis patient data in the EDs. Our dataset comprised demographic information, vital signs, and synthetic features. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was used to predict the risk of developing sepsis within 24 h after ED admission. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to provide a comprehensive interpretation of the model's results. Ten percent of the patients were randomly selected as the testing set, while the remaining patients were used for training with 10-fold cross-validation.

resultsFor 10-fold cross-validation on 14,957 samples, we reached an accuracy of 84.1%±0.3% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.92±0.02. The model achieved similar performance on the testing set of 1,662 patients. SHAP values showed that the five most important features were acuity, arrival transportation, age, shock index, and respiratory rate.

conclusionMachine learning models such as XGBoost may be used for sepsis prediction using only a small amount of data conveniently collected in the ED triage stage. This may help reduce workload in the ED and warn medical workers against the risk of sepsis in advance.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentInformaticsMachine learningSepsisTriage

Identifiers

PMID39290601
PMCPMC11402869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.