ArticleEmergency medicine international2024
Evaluation of CD4
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Peripheral adaptive immune cell counts and mortality in adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- A bibliometric and visual analysis of research trends and hotspots in sepsis-related immunosuppression (2005-2025).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Decreased CD3 + CD4+ T lymphocyte count predicts 28-day all-cause mortality in severe AECOPD patients admitted to the ICU: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Disease-specific alterations in the expression of circulating extracellular vesicle surface proteins in sepsis, hypertension and hypertensive sepsis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Characteristics of CD4Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Procalcitonin in Febrile People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLWH) Admitted to the Emergency Department.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis remains a major health condition with a high mortality rate that may be related to immunosuppression. T lymphocyte subsets may reflect the immune function of sepsis patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of CD4 Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study in a general ICU and enrolled patients with sepsis using the Sepsis-3 criteria. Peripheral blood samples were collected within 24 hours of enrollment or measurement of blood cell analysis and biomarkers of CD4 Results: A total of 100 patients with sepsis were enrolled and analyzed. CD4 Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that CD4
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.