Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290487›Full record

ArticleHCA healthcare journal of medicine2024

A Post-Suicide Survey: The Perspective We Have Been Missing.

Matthew Larsen, Cassandra Sauther, Ryan Sauther, Justin Solomon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HCA healthcare journal of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew LarsenEastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, Idaho Falls, ID.
Cassandra SautherEastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, Idaho Falls, ID.
Ryan SautherEastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, Idaho Falls, ID.
Justin SolomonEastern Idaho Regional Medical Center, Idaho Falls, ID.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suicide is a major problem in the United States and in the state of Idaho. Prevention data are lacking for suicide primarily because information about those who completed suicide is not attainable. There are no published data from surveying the family members of the deceased. Our objective was to learn more about those who died by suicide by surveying family members or close contacts of the deceased. Methods: We conducted a descriptive study using a 77-question survey to obtain information about those who died by suicide, with the survey being completed by their loved ones. Survey questions addressed the deceased's demographics, employment, mental health, substance use, access to lethal means, cultural and religious beliefs, relationships, etc. The survey was distributed in Southeast Idaho for 3 months. Results: Results showed that those who died by suicide in Southeast Idaho were predominantly: White (95%), male (77%), had no previous hospitalization for mental illness (76%), had a firearm in their home (66%), their religious beliefs matched those in their family and community (73%), they did not alert others or seek medical help (79%), had attempted suicide before (55%), had high stress in their most recent relationship (55%), or had current legal issues (54%). Firearms were the most common means of death (51%). Conclusion: In Southeast Idaho, our data suggested those at the highest risk of suicide were White men who previously attempted suicide, were experiencing a relationship change, had legal trouble, and had quick access to a firearm in their home. Suicide prevention efforts should be focused on these risk factors.

Indexed as

completed suicidefamilyIdahopost-suiciderisk-factorssuicidesuicide preventionsuicide statistics and numerical datasurvey

Identifiers

PMID39290487
PMCPMC11404594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.