Selective insensitivity to income held by the richest.

Barnabas Szaszi, Hooman Habibnia, Josephine Tan, Oliver P Hauser, Jon M Jachimowicz

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barnabas SzasziInstitute of Psychology, ELTE, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, 46 Izabella street, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7078-2712

Hooman HabibniaInstitute for Cognition and Behavior, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, 1 Welthandelsplatz, 1020 Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3915-2624

Josephine TanStanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 655 Knight Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Oliver P HauserDepartment of Economics and Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Exeter, Streatham Court, Rennes Drive, EX4 4PU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9282-0801

Jon M JachimowiczOrganizational Behavior Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02241-2275, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1197-8958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The misperception of income inequality is often touted as a critical barrier to more widespread support of redistributive policies. Here, we examine to what extent and why (mis)perceptions vary systematically across the income distribution. Drawing on data from four studies (

Indexed as

economic inequalitymisperceptionperceptionredistribution

Identifiers

PMID39290440

DOI10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae333

PMCPMC11407284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.