ArticleClinical interventions in aging2024
Expression of Acidic Fibrillar Protein and Neuroglobin in Thrombolytic Patients in Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Neuroglobin Protect Against Stroke? Insights Into the Role of Neurovascular Unit Cells.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Reflections on the Clinical Implications of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neuroglobin in Ischemic Stroke [Letter].Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
- Reflections on the Clinical Implications of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neuroglobin in Ischemic Stroke [Response to Letter].Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neuroglobin (NGB) are important biomarkers of cerebral hypoxia. For this reason, an attempt was made to assess their concentrations in various time intervals and their impact on the severity of neurological symptoms and functional prognosis of thrombolytic ischemic stroke patients. Patients and Methods: The study involved 94 patients reporting to the emergency department of the Collegium Medicum University Hospital in Bydgoszcz within < 4.5 hours of the onset of stroke symptoms. GFAP and neuroglobin levels were measured in plasma at indicated times using a commercial ELISA kit. Results: Based on the data gathered, statistically significant differences were found between the concentration of biomarkers in stroke patients and the control group. The concentrations of both biomarkers, GFAP and NGB, were elevated in patients after ischemic stroke and the changes in their concentrations in the subsequent stages of stroke may suggest their prognostic value strictly dependent on time. NGB was determined on the 7th day, and mRS - after a year (0.35). GFAP measured after 24 h and on day 7 could be a promising biomarker of functional outcome after one year (cut-off point ≤ 0.231 ng/mL, sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 61.2%, cut off point ≤ 0.235 ng/mL, sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 73.9%, respectively) and the severity of the patient's neurological condition. At GFAP concentrations above 0.25 ng/mL, measured within 24 hours, a sharp increase in mortality was observed in stroke patients. In the case of NGB, at the time of stroke occurrence (14 ng/mL) and after 24 hours (10-60 ng/mL). Differences in the concentrations of these biomarkers have been demonstrated in different stroke subtypes. Conclusion: NGB and GFAP are important biomarkers of ischemic brain injury and may also participate in predicting neurological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.