Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290316›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024

Cross-National Study on the Convergent, Discriminant, and Concurrent Validity of the "Body Size Perception" Item in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey.

Manon Rouche, Thérésa Lebacq, Anna Dzielska, Colette Kelly, Saoirse Nic Gabhainn, Caroline Mertens, Katia Castetbon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manon RoucheResearch Center in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Thérésa LebacqResearch Center in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Anna DzielskaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Colette KellyHealth Promotion Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Saoirse Nic GabhainnHealth Promotion Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Caroline MertensResearch Center in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Katia CastetbonResearch Center in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, School of Public Health, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite its significant usefulness in adolescent health studies, the single-item "body size perception" question, developed within the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey, has yet to undergo multidimensional validation. Objectives: To assess the convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the HBSC body size perception question among adolescents. Methods: The single-item HBSC body size perception question is as follows: "Do you think your body is…?," with answers ranging from "much too thin" to "much too fat." Fifteen-year-old participants included in the analysis were 72,086 from 45 HBSC countries in 2017/18 (concurrent validity), and 595, 127, and 615 in 2021/22 in French-speaking Belgium, Ireland, and Poland, respectively. The convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity was assessed with body dissatisfaction, social desirability, and selfesteem, respectively. The concurrent validity was also examined with body mass index (BMI) from the 2017/18 HBSC data. All analyses were sex-stratified. Results: Cohen's Kappa values were 0.67 [confidence interval (CI): 95%: 0.62, 0.72] and 0.64 (0.59, 0.69) for boys and girls, respectively, in all 3 countries together. Body size perception was associated with social desirability, selfesteem, and BMI, with a stronger association in girls than that in boys. For instance, girls with higher social desirability were less likely to perceive themselves as "too thin" [Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) = 0.78 (0.69, 0.89)] rather than as the "right size." Boys with higher selfesteem were less likely to perceive themselves as "too fat" [0.93 (0.90, 0.97)] rather than the "right size." Girls with underweight were less likely to perceive themselves as "too fat" [0.38 (0.34, 043)] rather than "right size" and girls with overweight/obesity were more likely to perceive themselves as such [8.19 (7.49, 8.95)]. Conclusions: The single-item HBSC body size perception question demonstrated good convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity. It reflects adolescents' own perception of body size, possibly influenced by societal norms and ideals.

Indexed as

adolescentsbody imagebody size perceptionHBSCvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39290316
PMCPMC11406042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.