Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290262›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Integrating machine learning for sustaining cybersecurity in digital banks.

Muath Asmar, Alia Tuqan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muath AsmarDepartment of Finance, Faculty of Business and Communication, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Alia TuqanMaster of Business Administration, Faculty of Graduate Studies, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cybersecurity continues to be an important concern for financial institutions given the technology's rapid development and increasing adoption of digital services. Effective safety measures must be adopted to safeguard sensitive financial data and protect clients from potential harm due to the rise in cyber threats that target digital organizations. The aim of this study is to investigates how machine learning algorithms are integrated into cyber security measures in the context of digital banking and its benefits and drawbacks. We initially provide a general overview of digital banks and the particular security concerns that differentiate them from conventional banks. Then, we explore the value of machine learning in strengthening cybersecurity defenses. We revealed that insider threats, distributed denial of service (DDoS) assaults, ransomware, phishing attacks, and social engineering are main cyberthreats that are digital banks exposed. We identify the appropriate machine learning algorithms such as support vector machines (SVM), recurrent neural networks (RNN), hidden markov models (HMM), and local outlier factor (LOF) that are used for detection and prevention cyberthreats. In addition, we provide a model that considers ethical concerns while constructing a cybersecurity framework to address potential vulnerabilities in digital banking systems. The advantages and disadvantages of incorporating machine learning into the cybersecurity strategy of digital banks are outlined using strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis. This study seeks to provide a thorough knowledge of how machine learning may strengthen cybersecurity procedures, protect digital banks, and maintain customer trust in the ecosystem of digital banking.

Indexed as

CybersecurityDigital bankingFraud detectionMachine learningPhishing attacksSecurity measures

Identifiers

PMID39290262
PMCPMC11407041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.