Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290234›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024

Diaphragm Assessment by Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging in Healthy Subjects.

Tianjie Zhang, Yan Liu, Dongwei Xu, Rui Dong, Ye Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of positive inspiratory and expiratory pressure on diaphragmatic mobility in asymptomatic individuals: Randomised, crossover clinical trial.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ultrasound innovations in diaphragm assessment: an integrative review of expanding clinical applications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianjie ZhangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, 201318, People's Republic of China.
Yan LiuDepartment of Ultrasonography, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, 201318, People's Republic of China.
Dongwei XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Rui DongDepartment of Ultrasonography, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, 201318, People's Republic of China.
Ye SongDepartment of Ultrasonography, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai, 201318, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) has been used to identify diaphragm dysfunction in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, there are few studies on DUS parameters to evaluate function, normal ranges, and influencing factors in population. The aim of this study is to provide a methodological reference for clinical evaluation of diaphragm function by measuring different DUS parameters in a healthy population. Methods: A descriptive study was conducted 212 (105 males, 107 females) subjects with normal spirometry underwent ultrasound imaging in this study. The diaphragm contraction and motion related parameters and shear wave velocity (SWV) were measured in the supine position. The effects of gender, age, body mass index (BMI) and lifestyle on diaphragm ultrasound parameters were analyzed. Results: The diaphragm thickness at end-expiration (DT-exp) was 0.14 ±0.05 cm, the diaphragm thickness at end- inspiration (DT-insp) was 0.29±0.10 cm, with thickening fraction (TF) was 1.11±0.54. The diaphragm excursion (DE) was 1.68±0.37cm and diaphragm velocity was 1.45±0.41 cm/s during calm breathing. During deep breathing, the DE was 5.06±1.40cm and diaphragm velocity was 3.20±1.18 cm/s. The Diaphragm shear modulus-longitudinal view were Mean16.72±4.07kPa, Max25.04±5.58kPa, Min11.06±3.88kPa, SD2.56±0.98. The results of diaphragmatic measurement showed that the DT of males was significantly greater than that of females (P< 0.05), but there was no significant difference in TF. The DT-insp (r=0.155, P= 0.024) and the DT-exp (r=0.252, P=0.000) were positively correlated with age, and the DE during calm breathing was negatively correlated with age (r=-0.218, P= 0.001) and BMI (r=-00.280, P= 0.000). The DE (R=0.371, P=0.000) and velocity (R=0.368, P=0.000) during deep breathing were correlated with lifestyle. Conclusion: Our study provides normal reference values of the diaphragm and evaluates the influence of gender, age, body mass index and lifestyle on diaphragmatic morphology.

Indexed as

diaphragmreference valuessupine positionultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39290234
PMCPMC11406537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.