Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39290086›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

The Relative Reinforcing Value of Menthol Among Young Adult Cigarette Smokers: Results From a Behavioral Choice Task.

Amy M Cohn, Hoda Elmasry, Rebecca Ashare, Wallace Pickworth, James G Murphy, Andrea C Villanti, Donald Hedeker, Delaney Dunn, Riley Wyatt, Taylor Niznik and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Amy M CohnDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9034-4293
Hoda ElmasryDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Rebecca AshareDepartment of Psychology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4664-009X
Wallace PickworthBattelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3310-2567
James G MurphyDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Andrea C VillantiRutgers Institute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3104-966X
Donald HedekerThe Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Delaney DunnTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Riley WyattTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Taylor NiznikTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-3658-3446
Whitney D MargaritisTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Michael A SmithTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Sarah J EhlkeTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Janet Audrain-McGovernDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI ROBERT S. MANNEL · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
Measuring young adult appeal for menthol cigarettes using laboratory and intensivelongitudinal methodsR01DA046359 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI COHN, AMY M · 2018 to 2020
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046359NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792NIH HHS R01DA046359Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust P30CA2255520Stephenson Cancer Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMenthol cigarettes are associated with experimentation and progression to regular use. Although reinforcement processes likely underlie menthol's appeal, the reinforcing value of menthol cigarettes remains unknown. AIMS AND

methodsThis study examined the relative reinforcing value (RRV) of menthol versus nonmenthol cigarettes in young adult menthol (n = 54) and nonmenthol (n = 53) smokers, and differences in menthol's RRV by race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Overnight abstinent participants completed a choice task assessing willingness to "work" to click targets on a computer screen to earn menthol or nonmenthol cigarette puffs. A progressive ratio schedule was used where the menthol target had to be clicked progressively more times, over 10 trials, to earn a menthol cigarette puff, while clicks for the nonmenthol target were fixed across trials. RRV for menthol was defined by the breakpoint, or the highest trial (out of to 10) completed for a menthol cigarette puff. Number of clicks for menthol and nonmenthol puffs were also examined.

resultsMenthol smokers worked harder for menthol versus nonmenthol cigarette puffs (breakpoint = 9.17; ~1236 clicks vs. 24 clicks). Breakpoint was higher among Hispanic (6.49) versus NH White (4.83) and NH non-White smokers (4.43). In exploratory analyses of interactions of menthol preference with race and ethnicity, nonmenthol Hispanic smokers worked harder for menthol cigarette puffs versus NH non-White and NH White nonmenthol smokers.

conclusionsMenthol cigarettes are highly reinforcing for young adult menthol and Hispanic smokers. A menthol ban may reduce addiction risk among younger individuals and some minoritized groups of smokers. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides evidence of the greater relative reinforcing value of menthol compared to nonmenthol cigarettes among young adults who had a cigarette flavor preference, suggesting increased addiction risk of menthol cigarettes. Young adult menthol smokers and Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) smokers worked harder to earn menthol (vs. nonmenthol) cigarette puffs. Findings add to the evidence base supporting the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) intent to ban menthol in cigarettes. Further, prevention messaging campaigns and cessation programs should take into account the reinforcing value of menthol in cigarettes, especially in vulnerable and at-risk populations.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCigarette SmokingMentholReinforcement, PsychologySmokersTobacco ProductsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultMenthol

Identifiers

PMID39290086
PMCPMC12187066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.