ArticleThe Permanente journal2024
A Comparison of In-Person and Telemedicine Triage in Otolaryngology.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe integration of virtual visits has been met with skepticism by many surgical specialties, including otolaryngology, due to the lack of a complete physical exam. Analysis of differences in the workup between patients triaged virtually or in-person is warranted.
methodsA chart review was performed for a cohort of adults undergoing septoplasty (January 2021-May 2022). Groups (telemedicine, in-person) were compared by 2-sample
resultsOf 338 patients, initial evaluation was in-person for 225 (66.5%) and via telemedicine for 113 (33.5%). The groups were similar in demographics (mean age 39.1 years for telemedicine vs 38.8 years for in-person, female 28.9% vs male 37.7%, DISCUSSION: In this cohort, triage by telemedicine allowed otolaryngology patients to have an expedited path to surgery despite having more visits. There is no evidence to suggest that otolaryngologists had an overreliance on diagnostic modalities when triaging by telemedicine.
conclusionAmong patients undergoing septoplasty, those initially evaluated by telemedicine were more likely to have more preoperative visits and shorter time to surgery than those evaluated in person. Telemedicine can serve as an effective method for triaging surgical patients without excess diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.