ArticleScience progress
Comparison of the effect of combination therapies in the treatment of large varicose ulcers: A real-world cohort study.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe primary treatment for varicose ulcers is to address the underlying cause of venous hypertension, additionally, split-thickness skin transplantation (ST) is an effective option for large ulcers. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of venous surgery with or without split-thickness ST in the management of varicose ulcers (diameter ≥6 cm).
methodsPatients with varicose ulcers between 2013 and 2023 were included in the real-world retrospective cohort study. The endovenous microwave ablation/endovenous laser ablation-high ligation-foam sclerotherapy-compression therapy + ST group (EMA/EVLA-CT-HL-FS + ST) consisted of 32 patients, while the EMA/EVLA-CT-HL-FS group consisted of 48 patients.
resultsA difference in ulcer healing time was found between the two groups (the hazard ratio [HR] was 4.4, 95% CI [2.3-8.2], P < 0.0001). However, the healing rate did not differ between the two groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.
conclusionST has been shown to expedite ulcer healing and ameliorate the symptoms of VVs in the early stages of treatment, while its intermediate to long-term efficacy for ulcer healing and overall patient quality of life may be limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.