ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Spectral Zones-Based SHAP/LIME: Enhancing Interpretability in Spectral Deep Learning Models Through Grouped Feature Analysis.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for food flavor prediction and regulation: models, data integration, and future perspectives.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Causal Responsibility Based Explainable AI for Vibrational Spectroscopy Applied to Oral FTIR and Oesophageal Raman Diagnostics.Research square · 2026Article
- Raman spectroscopy combined with multiple technologies for label-free identification of immune cells: An overview.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
- Enhancing spectral analysis of ghee adulteration via a deep learning-based multimodal attention mechanism.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multivariate Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Electrical Resistivity of Concrete Using Degree of Saturation and Pore-Structure Parameters.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility Assessment of Telehealth-Based Cancer Pain Management Through Machine Learning: A Prospective Clinical Study.Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Using SHAP and LIME to Explain Machine Learning Models Predicting Comorbid Depression and Stroke From Daily Dietary Nutrient Intake in a US Population-Based Study.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy of Saliva and Machine Learning as a Screening Test for Sjögren Disease.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Pan-microalgal dark proteome mapping via interpretable deep learning and synthetic chimeras.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Machine-Learning-Driven Phenotyping in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Remote Sensing and Artificial Intelligence Integration: Advances, Applications, and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Prediction Model of Stable Warfarin Doses in Patients After Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Identification of tobacco leaf diseases using hyperspectral imaging and machine learning with SHAP interpretability analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpretability is just as important as accuracy when it comes to complex models, especially in the context of deep learning models. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approaches have been developed to address this problem. The literature on XAI for spectroscopy mainly emphasizes independent feature analysis with limited application of zone analysis. Individual feature analysis methods, such as shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME), have limitations due to their dependence on perturbations. These methods measure how AI models respond to sudden changes in the individual feature values. While they can help identify the most impactful features, the abrupt shifts introduced by replacing these values with zero or the expected ones may not accurately represent real-world scenarios. This can lead to mathematical and computational interpretations that are neither physically realistic nor intuitive to humans. Our proposed method does not rely on individual disturbances. Instead, it targets "spectral zones" to directly estimate the effect of group disturbances on a trained model. Consequently, factors such as sample size, hyperparameter selection, and other training-related considerations are not the primary focus of the XAI methods. To achieve this, we have developed a modified version of LIME and SHAP capable of performing group perturbations, enhancing explainability and realism while minimizing noise in the plots used for interpretability. Additionally, we employed an efficient approach to calculate spectral zones for complex spectra with indistinct spectral boundaries. Users can also define the zones themselves using their domain-specific knowledge.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.