Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289882›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Evaluation of rifle cartridge and shot placement for euthanizing feral swine (Sus scrofa) in traps.

Michael J Lavelle, Nathan P Snow, Vienna R Brown, Michael J Bodenchuk, Seth M Cook, Kurt C VerCauteren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael J LavelleUSDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2766-5673
Nathan P SnowUSDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Vienna R BrownUSDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, National Feral Swine Damage Management Program, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Michael J BodenchukUSDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, San Antonio, TX 78269, USA.
Seth M CookUSDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Kurt C VerCauterenUSDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4783-493X

Funding

USDA APHIS WS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feral swine are a highly destructive invasive species around the globe. Wildlife managers commonly trap and euthanize feral swine with firearms to reduce their adverse impacts. The utility of euthanizing domestic swine with firearms has been considered when emergency situations arise such as in the event of a foreign animal disease outbreak in domestic swine. Similarly, the rapid depopulation of domestic swine facilities became necessary when the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted pork production in 2020. Evaluation of the effects of caliber, cartridge, size of feral swine, and shot placement on effectiveness and safety of the method is needed. We collected data from feral swine euthanized in traps on how those variables influenced the effectiveness in time to death and number of shots required and safety risks based on the occurrence of bullet pass-through (i.e., bullet exiting the pig). We tested 3 cartridges of 2 calibers (0.22 long rifle, 0.22 Winchester magnum rimfire, and 0.308 Winchester) delivered from a rifle with 3 shot placements targeting the brain. From 570 euthanization events, we calculated an average time to death of 100.06 (SD = 29.24) s, with larger feral swine taking slightly longer. Most feral swine (73%) were euthanized with a single shot but averaged 1.28 (SD = 0.48) shots overall. Safety risks from pass-through shots were more common when using the 0.308 Winchester cartridge, and when rear and side shot placements were used. Overall, we recommend a 0.22 long rifle cartridge and frontal shot placement as an effective and safe option for euthanizing feral swine in traps, and likely for domestic swine of similar size and shot distances.

Indexed as

Animals, WildAnimalsEuthanasia, AnimalFirearmsSus scrofaSwinediseaseeuthanizationgunshotSus scrofaswinetrapping

Identifiers

PMID39289882
PMCPMC11484799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.