ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Fungi identified via next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid among patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amplicon-based sequencing as a diagnostic tool for severe pneumonia in the ICU.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe epidemiology of fungi identified via next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid among patients with COVID-19 is unknown.
methodsDe-identified information, including age, SARS-CoV-2 reads and fungi from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, were used to analysis.
resultsA total of 960 patients with COVID-19 were included. Gender was unknown in 38 patients, and 648 (70.3%) of the rest patients were male. For 876 patients with information on age, their mean ± standard age was 63.4 ± 21.3 years, with the minimum being 0.2 years and the maximum being 101 years. For all the patients, their median [interquartile range] SARS-CoV-2 reads were 26,038 [4421.5, 44,641.5]. The Aspergilli were identified in 159 (16.6%) patients, with Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus niger in 103 (10.7%), 81 (8.4%) and 17 (1.8%), respectively. The Mucoraceae were identified in 14 (1.5%) patients. Pneumocystis jirovecii was identified in 65 (6.8%) patients, among whom 12 (18.5%) patients also had Aspergilli. The Cryptococcaceae and the Dematiaceae were also identified in some patients, including Cryptococcus in 11 (1.1%) patients.
conclusionsIn bronchoalveolar lavage fluid among patients with COVID-19, the Aspergilli were very commonly identified, as were the Mucoraceae, Pneumocystis jirovecii and Cryptococcus via next-generation sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.