Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289753›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

Study protocol: Optimising patient positioning for the planning of accelerated partial breast radiotherapy for the integrated magnetic resonance linear accelerator: OPRAH MRL.

Jenna Dean, Nigel Anderson, Georgia K B Halkett, Jessica Lye, Mark Tacey, Farshad Foroudi, Michael Chao, Caroline Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenna DeanRadiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. jenna.dean@austin.org.au.
Nigel AndersonRadiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Georgia K B HalkettCurtin School of Nursing/Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
Jessica LyeRadiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Mark TaceyRadiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Farshad ForoudiRadiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Michael ChaoRadiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Caroline WrightDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an accepted treatment option for early breast cancer. Treatment delivered on the Magnetic Resonance integrated Linear Accelerator (MRL) provides the added assurance of improved soft tissue visibility, important in the delivery of APBI. This technique can be delivered in both the supine and prone positions, however current literature suggests that prone treatment on the MRL is infeasible due to physical limitations with bore size. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of positioning patients on a custom designed prone breast board compared with supine positioning on a personalised vacuum bag. Geometric distortion, the relative position of Organs at Risk (OAR) to the tumour bed and breathing motion (intrafraction motion) will be compared between the supine and prone positions. The study will also investigate the positional impact on dosimetry, patient experience, and position preference.

methodsUp to 30 patients will be recruited over a 12-month period for participation in this Human Research Ethics Committee approved exploratory cohort study. Patients will be scanned on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Simulator in both the supine and prone positions as per current standard of care for APBI simulation. Supine and prone positioning comparisons will all be assessed on de-identified MRI image pairs, acquired using appropriate software. Patient experience will be explored through completion of a short, anonymous electronic survey. Descriptive statistics will be used for reporting of results with categorical, parametric/non-parametric tests applied (data format dependent). Survey results will be interpreted by comparison of percentage frequencies across the Likert scales. Thematic content analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data from the open-ended survey questions. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will be used to assess the feasibility of treating patients with APBI in the prone position on a custom designed board on the MRL. It may also be used to assist with identification of patients who would benefit from this position over supine without the need to perform both scans. Patient experience and technical considerations will be utilised to develop a tool to assist in this process. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN1262400067583. Registered 28th of May 2024. https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12624000679583.aspx.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingParticle AcceleratorsPatient PositioningRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansOrgans at RiskProne PositionRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSupine PositionAccelerated partial breast irradiationEarly breast cancerMagnetic resonance LinacPatient positioningProneRadiotherapySupine

Identifiers

PMID39289753
PMCPMC11409614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.