Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289745›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2024

A systematic scoping review of carer accommodation in eating disorders.

Ashish Kumar, Hubertus Himmerich, Johanna Louise Keeler, Janet Treasure

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashish KumarChildren's Eating Disorder Service, Knowsley Resource and Recovery Centre, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, UK.
Hubertus HimmerichCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Johanna Louise Keeler *Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. johanna.keeler@kcl.ac.uk.
Janet Treasure *Centre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accommodation of eating disorder (ED) behaviours by carers is one of the maintaining processes described in the cognitive interpersonal model of anorexia nervosa. This systematic scoping review aimed to explore studies examining accommodating and enabling behaviour, including how it impacts upon the carer's own mental health and the outcome of illness in their loved ones. METHODS AND

resultsIn this systematic scoping review, five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL) were searched for studies measuring accommodating and enabling behaviour in carers of people with EDs. A total of 36 studies were included, of which 10 were randomised trials, 13 were longitudinal studies, nine were cross-sectional studies and four were qualitative studies. Carers of people with EDs were found to have high level of accommodating and enabling behaviour which reduced following treatment, although no single type of intervention was found to be superior to others. Higher accommodation in carers was associated with higher level of emotional distress, anxiety and fear. There was mixed evidence around whether accommodating and enabling behaviour in carers impacted the outcome of illness in their loved ones.

conclusionAccommodating and enabling behaviours are frequently seen in carers of people with AN, and carer-focused interventions are able to reduce these behaviours, although it is unclear if any intervention shows superiority. There may be nuances in the impact of these behaviours related to interactions within the support network and variations in the forms of co-morbidity in patients. More studies with a larger sample size and which include both mothers and fathers are required.

Indexed as

AccommodationAnorexia nervosaEating disordersEnabling behavioursSystematic scoping review

Identifiers

PMID39289745
PMCPMC11409591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.