Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39289719›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2024

Differential contribution of elbow flexion and knee extension on vascular and hemodynamic parameters and arterial stiffness indices after acute strength exercise in young adults.

Patricia Maria Cardoso Santos, Aline Cristina Sierve Oliveira, Leonardo Ribeiro Vieira, Isabel Cristina Gomes, Janaine Cunha Polese, Lucas Túlio de Lacerda, Bruno Almeida Rezende, Danusa Dias Soares, Maria Gloria Rodrigues-Machado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patricia Maria Cardoso SantosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Faculdade Ciências Médicas- MG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Aline Cristina Sierve OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Faculdade Ciências Médicas- MG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Leonardo Ribeiro VieiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Faculdade Ciências Médicas- MG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Isabel Cristina GomesUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Janaine Cunha PoleseUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Lucas Túlio de LacerdaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Bruno Almeida RezendePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Faculdade Ciências Médicas- MG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Danusa Dias SoaresUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Maria Gloria Rodrigues-MachadoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Faculdade Ciências Médicas- MG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. maria.machado@cienciasmedicasmg.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9950-1707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent types of exercise, performed acutely or chronically, have different repercussions on central hemodynamics, arterial stiffness, and cardiac function. In this study, we aim to compare the effects of acute elbow flexion (EFlex) and knee extension (KExt) exercises on vascular and hemodynamic parameters and arterial stiffness indices in healthy young adults.

methodsYoung adults (20 to 39 years) underwent randomized muscle strength tests to obtain 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for elbow flexion (EFlex) and knee extension (KExt). After a minimum interval of 48 h, cardiovascular parameters were assessed using Mobil-O-Graph

resultsImmediately after exercise (T0), peripheral systolic blood pressure, peripheral pulse pressure, central systolic blood pressure, and central pulse pressure were significantly higher in KExt than EFlex (Δ 3.13; Δ 3.06; Δ 5.65; Δ 5.61 mmHg, respectively). Systolic volume, cardiac output, and cardiac index were significantly higher immediately after KExt when compared with EFlex (Δ 4.2 ml; Δ 0.27 ml/min and 0.14 l/min*1/m

conclusionOur results show differential contribution of muscle mass in vascular and hemodynamic parameters evaluated immediately after EFlex and KExt. In addition, our study showed for the first time that the reflection coefficient, an index that evaluates the magnitude of the reflected waves from the periphery, was only affected by KExt.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisAugmentation indexCardiovascular diseasesPulse wave velocityVascular stiffness

Identifiers

PMID39289719
PMCPMC11406758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.